A scene to break an old journalist’s heart: I was speaking to a room full of media and communications students earlier this week - must have been about 60-70 people there.
I asked how many of them bought a newspaper every day. Three hands went up. That’s right – I said media and communications students.
For most people under the age of 30, the newspaper is basically finished. They simply don’t see the point of them. Why wait for yesterday’s news to be handed over in a pile of paper which can’t even be updated? They carry devices on which they can receive as much news as they want.
Some newspapers – my old employer the Financial Times is an obvious example – do have a future as high-end, specialist products available at quite a high price. (The FT may or may not continue to be printed on paper, but that is a second order consideration. It looks great on an iPad.) In London, the Evening Standard has a (paper-based) future. It is distributed free, and with a circulation of 730,000 is now arguably the best-read quality newspaper in the UK. And they are literally giving it away.
But every other newspaper (the generalist ones I mean) faces a hard choice: to go on distributing a paper-based product at great expense to an ever-diminishing group of people. Or to give up on newsprint and go electronic-only, with or without a paywall. Find your customers, and then see if you can charge them enough for what you are offering.
So what are we going to read on trains/subways/planes? Screens, probably, of one kind or another. Or books. Real ones, printed on paper.
